Reactions & Foresights

Why is Qualitative Research often undervalued? Part 2

In the second of a two-part series, Edward Appleton looks at why qualitative research is undervalued and how we can improve its value perceptions.

Social Media Misses

Many qualitative researchers, even companies, don’t use the simple (and free) digital opportunities offered by the likes of LinkedIn to raise the profile of what they’re doing professionally.

On an industry association level, the AQR in the UK does a great job a mobilizing on events, training stuff, but does it really have a co-ordinated effort to raise the profile of what it does, via Social Media or otherwise? Of reaching out to the marketing community? Comments welcome.

Business Acumen – is that with a c or a k?

It has to be said that many great researchers aren’t great business people, which was historically a drag on focused growth.

Quallies however are often self-employed, they run their own shops, are mindful of costs, payment terms and conditions, with a strong bias towards action. So they are (or should be) business savvy.

But not many have worked on the client side – and so lack a first-hand understanding of how larger organizations tick.

Relationships with clients do exist of course, including to higher up echelons – but often on an individual level.

Permeating a client side company with qual inspiration is an organizational effort that is challenging particularly for one (wo)man bands.

So qual often remains in the category of “explore, understand” – and lacking the (wo)manpower to really follow-through.

Quallie = Softie?

Which brings us to the core of the piece: qualitative research is perceptually still at the soft end of things.

At worst, there are still perceptions of qual being unreliable, subjective, flaky, with reports (notably in the US) being prefaced by a sort of health warning – “careful, this is only qual!”

It’s a strange thing – the economic relevance of framed narratives, storytelling should be clear – messages that go viral are hugely powerful, influencing even at a government level. It’s not restricted to YouTube, just think of the impact of Greta Thunberg and the #FridaysForFuture movement.

To borrow from the online blurb on Professor Robert Shiller’s new book “Narrative Economics”, the stories people tell affect economic outcomes.

That’s the essence of what good qual does – sifting, decoding and re-telling stories from all across the customer and influencer base, framing business challenges in such a way that clients see things differently, from their customer perspective, warts and all.

So it really belongs at strategy level.

How to get there? Some thoughts.

Thoughts for a bulked-up Qual Presence

  • Having powerful voices on your side helps – the academic community undoubtedly is influential, best-selling books help.
  • Getting beyond a narrow qual perspective is also useful, adopting a joined-up approach – working with all sorts of data sources to fuse them together, making broadly informed business recommendations. Is qual full of the type of polyglot people to deliver on that? We need more. Larger agencies can take a lead here.
  • Defend our space – we also need to put our brains to work on finding our very own human-inspired solutions and approaches to compete differently with the larger consultancy firms who are entering the qual space. What really characterizes a brilliant qual person – beyond individual charisma – what are the precise competences and skills? Can we find our own language that builds bridges from the naïve consumer perspective to company-specific jargon and acronyms?
  • On another level: the descriptor “qualitative research” is potentially limiting – unqualified, it pigeon-holes suppliers to legacy perceptions: focus groups and in-depth interviews. And of course the word “qual” focuses on the approach (qual = smaller numbers) rather than outcomes.
  • Maybe pushing AI-powered tools helps reposition qual, as some tech-based companies are currently doing – using AI to “scale qual” is an interesting avenue, making it quicker, easier to access on a global basis, possibly cheaper on a unit level. But is that really qual – which is surely about the power of small and thick data?

Many topics – for future blog posts perhaps. I will rest my pen.

Curious, as ever, as to others’ views.

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.
Please note that your e-mail address will not be publicly displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles